• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   EACIR Home
    • 2. EAC Institutions
    • Lake Victoria Basin Commission (LVBC)
    • LVBC Programmes and Projects
    • Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project Phase I (LVEMP I)
    • View Item
    •   EACIR Home
    • 2. EAC Institutions
    • Lake Victoria Basin Commission (LVBC)
    • LVBC Programmes and Projects
    • Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project Phase I (LVEMP I)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Potential of fungal pathogens for biological control of water hyacinth

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Potential of fungal pathogens for biological control of water hyacinth.pdf (185.8Kb)
    Author
    Molo, Richard
    Ogwang, James A
    Date
    2005
    Type
    Article
    Item Usage Stats
    276
    views
    135
    downloads
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-citation

    Potential of fungal pathogens for biological control of water hyacinth Richard Molo and James A. Ogwang Namulonge Agricultural and Animal Production Research Institute (NAARI), P. O. Box 7084, Kampala, Uganda

    Abstract/Overview

    A survey of fungal pathogens of water hyacinth were under taken in lakes Victoria and Kyoga and River Nile in Uganda and several potential isolates including Alternaria eichhorniae (Nag Raj and Ponnappa), Cercospora sp. and Acremonium zonatum were identified. Isolates of Cercospora sp. and A. eichhorniae were evaluated for their effectiveness on water hyacinth plants in the screen house. The disease incidence and severity progressed with time in both isolates although there was no (p>0.05) significant difference between the isolates, and overall disease incidence and severity was not (p>0.05) significant. However, Alternaria eichhorniae caused higher disease incidence than Cercospora sp. in the first and second week after inoculation while Cercospora sp. caused higher disease severity than A. eichhorniae after fourteen days. Both pathogens caused (p>0.05) significant reduction in overall plant fresh weight and no effects on number of living leaves and number of daughter plants. The disease infection also increased with increasing conidia concentration and as time progressed, and was significantly (p<0.01) lower at the lower conidia doses. Host range tests on 9 cultivated plant species showed that sorghum was highly susceptible to Cercospora sp. while A. eichhorniae did not cause disease symptoms on any of the plants. This study suggests that both pathogens have potential for biological control of water hyacinth, but A. eichhorniae is safer to use than Cercospora sp.

    Subject
    Fungal pathogens; Water hyacinth control
    Publisher
    Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project (LVEMP)
    Permalink
    http://hdl.handle.net/11671/788
    Collections
    • Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project Phase I (LVEMP I) [112]


    Contact Us | Usage Policies
     
    Languages
    Related Links
    EACIR PortalEAC Reports DatabaseEBSCO DatabaseEAC IRC Catalogue

    Browse

    All of EACIRBrowse CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Contact Us | Usage Policies